The United States Conspiracy Law

You will be Convicted on Conspiracy in a Federal Court without committing the alleged crime

In any federal prison, you will quickly discover that the majority of the prisoners are convicted on an alleged "Conspiracy" crime., and the reason the prosecutors use "Conspiracy" is simple to understand.  In an alleged conspiracy you will be found guilty because you had a contact with other person, and regardless of whether you actually committed a crime or not, and regardless what, when, and how much you knew about the alleged conspiracy, and yet regardless of whether or not the alleged crime is committed. This may sound like fiction, but it is not. In a Federal Court YOU WILL BE FOUND GUILTY on a conspiracy charge. Guilty is a 100% guaranteed outcome because the  Jury will be instructed to find you guilty regardless of whether you participated in an alleged crime or not...

If you find this hard to believe; here, read how this federal Judge instructed the jury, this is actual Court records.

 

How they define Conspiracy

A conspiracy occurs when two or more people agree to commit an alleged act and take some step toward its completion. Conspiracy is an inchoate crime because it does not require that the alleged illegal act actually have been completed. For instance, a group of individuals can be convicted of conspiracy to commit burglary even if the actual burglary never happens. Conspiracy is also unique in that, unlike attempt, a defendant can be charged with both conspiracy to commit a crime, and the crime itself if the crime is completed. Inchoate crimes, also known as incomplete crimes, are acts taken toward committing a crime or acts that constitute indirect participation in a crime. Although these acts are not themselves crimes, they are illegal because they are conducted in furtherance of a crime, and society wishes to deter individuals from taking such steps

The word "furtherance" can be stretched endlessly in a corrupt system - such as the United States Federal Courts, and in particular the Southern District of New York.  The stretching is accomplished through fabrications, lies, false and paid witnesses, and terror tactics. Is this legal? Somehow it is - here's how:

 The Federal Prosecutors have something called "ABSOLUTE IMMUNITY", which is a form of legal immunity for government officials that confers total immunity from criminal prosecution and lawsuits so long as they are acting within the scope of their duties. The Question is now narrower, because the prosecutor's duty is to "Go and get the guy."  Prosecutors can and will tell endless lies knowing that they are immune. IN-FACT, Prosecutors will disregard a Court order using their "Absolute immunity" as a defense.  See for Example: Chichakli vs. Bharara, Case No.: 15-04583 (SDNY)

Learn More

What is Conspiracy

The essence of conspiracy is an agreement of two or more persons to engage in some form of prohibited conduct. The crime is complete upon agreement, although some statutes require prosecutors to show that at least one of the conspirators has taken some concrete step or committed some overt act in furtherance of the scheme. There are dozens of federal conspiracy statutes. One, 18 U.S.C. 371, outlaws conspiracy to commit some other federal crime.

It should not surprise you to find Conspiracy indictment with ONE Defendant, despite that a conspiracy requires at-least two "Conspirators." The government overrides the requirement by inserting a text such as "The named defendant conspired with one or mode conspirator, known or unknown." See: United States v. Richard Chichakli, 09-Cr-1002 (WHP)

there are basically 5 elements for the crime of Conspiracy. Those elements are: 1. You must have 2 or more persons who 2. Intentionally 3. make an agreement 4. to violate federal law or defraud the United states, and then 5. Commit some overt act in furtherance of the agreement. This means that in proving that there are two (2) or more person involved, undercover officers and confidential informants would not count because they would not have the requisite criminal intent. Well, covering-up the role of informant - as it is the case in United States v. Viktor Bout,1:08-cr-00365 where the Informant "Andrew Smulian" was named as a co-conspirator defendant in the case, and then he was released after Bout's trial.  

Learn More